March 3, 2007
View Comments | Post CommentThe Incredible? Or Ineffable? Egg.
![]() Yes, it may kill me, but what a way to go! |
The thing about eggs that puzzles me most is how they are the one food that swings back and forth on the "good-for-you, bad-for-you" pendulum the most. One day we are praising their high protein levels, the next we are shunning them for the high fat content. Next they are good brain food, and soon after they are ticking cholesterol time bombs.
The fact that they go back and forth alone seems to be enough of a mystery in and of itself. There aren't too many doctors lining up to promote the healthy attributes of deep-fried foie gras, nor are is there a coalition of people looking to place "Mr. Yuck" stickers on broccoli cases either.
We seem to know for the most part what is good for us, and what is bad for us. So why is there so much debate over eggs?
![]() The best "fried egg" photo I have ever seen. From In Praise of Sardines |
So on the good side of things, the yolk contains protein, as well as large doses of vitamins A and D (fat soluble vitamins - who'd've guessed?...), and even a dash of folic acid and vitamin B12 - which together make them useful for mothers-to-be.
On the flip side, the yolk is where you will find most the calories (about 60 of an egg's 75), all of the fat (about 5g per egg) and all of the cholesterol (213mg/egg - closing in on an entire day's recommended intake). Simply put, if you have a pair of eggs for breakfast, you are over your daily intake for cholesterol and you've had a good portion of your saturated fat intake as well. Further clouding the issue, the jury is still out on whether it is cholesterol intake or saturated fat intake that is more detrimental to your health...
So the question is, "Does the positive aspects of egg consumption outweigh the negative ones?" And simply put, the answer is, "We don't know."
The fact that eggs have found themselves swinging in and out of favor with those who determine from on-high what is good and bad for us is yet another perfect example of how little we know about nutrition science. The American Egg Board wants you to believe that they are OK, but they obviously have an agenda when they say this. (Just like how the big oil companies want you to believe global warming is "junk science" - consider your sources people!) On the other side of things, the American Heart Association says that one egg a day is OK (seeing as how one egg is just below your recommended daily cholesterol intake) but that also means that you need to then pretty much avoid all other cholesterol for the rest of the day if you have said egg.
![]() So, will we be seeing "Newman's Own 50-Egg Caesar Dressing" any time soon?... |
But please, don't buy into the latest hype commercials that eggs are the "miracle food". It is possible to consume foods that have all of the nutrients found in eggs without the inherent drawbacks that come in the total package of eggs. The key as always is a balanced diet - one that can include eggs! - to make sure you don't do too much damage to yourself.
And let's all be clear on the title of "miracle food". That designation was awarded to eggs' best accompaniment - bacon - many years ago.
Posted by Matt Finarelli at March 3, 2007 10:51 AM | Comments (0) |




