August 6, 2006

View Comments | Post Comment

Coquilles St. Jacques

I first got a recipe for Coquilles St. Jacques from Cara a few years ago. I've made a dish similar to this one many times, sometimes deviating from her original recipe by a little, sometimes by a lot. For instance, back then, I never had scallops available, and rarely had mushrooms, so I'd do the same recipe but with chicken or fish. But I didn't know, back then, that "coquilles" meant "scallops" in French--I just thought "Coquilles St. Jacques" was the name of the dish as a whole. (Note: As I've since been informed--see below--coquilles means shells, because the dish is traditionally served in the scallop shells. But it is traditionally made with scallops). So I'd tell people I was serving Chicken Coquilles St. Jacques, and serve a dish devoid of ocean life (and shells). Luckily, no one to whom I served the dish knew what "coquilles" meant either. And it was still pretty good without scallops, but not nearly as good as the real thing.

If done right, the sauce is rich and creamy, the scallops tender, and the mushroom flavor barely insinuated into the dish. Despite my usual habit whereby I end up, after several iterations, deciding on a procedure not at all like the one described in the original recipe, this one is still fairly close to the original one Cara gave me. I've changed the order of things a bit, and changed how the scallops are cooked (hers were cooked in butter--but for too long, in my opinion), as well as the mushrooms. But those are minor changes in a great recipe.

Also, this dish can be made ahead of time, and reheated in an oven to serve. That, and its general fanciness, make it great for dinner parties and such. And if you serve it in the scallop shells, it's handheld and perfect as an hors d'oeuvre. But that means, as a prerequisite, finding scallops in the shells. In D.C., that means Maine Ave. fish market or bust.

Coquilles St. Jacques with Mushrooms

Makes 4 small servings. Easily can be doubled. Prep time: 15 minutes. Cooking time: 30 minutes between stove and oven.

The ingredients:

  • 1/2 pound scallops, washed and drained. If you get big sea scallops, you're going to have to cut them up into 3 or 4 pieces anyway, so you might as well just get the small, cheap, bay scallops. On the other hand, if you can get the big ones with the shells, it'll make for a very nice presentation.
  • 1 cup chopped mushrooms (chanterelles, if you can find and afford them, else portobellos, else buttons)
  • 1 cup white wine, such as sauvignon blanc or pinot grigio. It doesn't have to be especially dry.
  • 1/2 cup heavy whipping cream
  • 1 shallot, minced (or you can substitute 1/4 cup of onion and a clove of garlic)
  • 1 oz of parmesan (or about 2 tbsp grated parmesan)
  • 1/4 cup breadcrumbs (or about 1 1/2 slices of white bread if you're making your own)
  • 1/2 tbsp lemon juice (about 1/3 of a lemon, squeezed)
  • 1/8 cup of flour
  • 1 bay leaf
  • Dash of marjoram
  • Dash of paprika
  • Dash of thyme
  • Dash of cayenne pepper
  • Dash of black pepper
  • 1 1/2 tsp salt
  • 1/4 cup water

The algorithm:

If you already have breadcrumbs, skip this paragraph. If you are making your own bread crumbs, heat the oven to 300 degrees Fahrenheit and put 2 slices of bread on a rack in a pan. Bake for about 15 minutes, until all moisture has been cooked out of the bread. It won't turn golden and toasty. You have to feel it and see if it's completely dried out to crouton-like consistency. When it's done, take it out and crush 1 1/2 slices of the bread into tiny little crumbs, either by hand, or with your crushing method of choice (mortar and pestle? baseball bat? medieval mace? headbutts?).

Melt 1/2 tbsp in saucepan over medium heat. Sautee mushrooms for about 4 minutes. Transfer mushrooms into separate bowl and reserve. Resist eating.

Add another 1/2 tbsp of butter to the saucepan. Sautee shallot (or onion and garlic, if used instead of shallot) for about five minutes, until tender. Add 1/4 cup of water, then bay leaf, then lemon, then wine. Turn heat up to high. Add dash of marjoram, dash of thyme, 1/2 tsp salt. Bring to a boil. Let it boil for about 2 minutes. Don't watch it.

Add scallops and poach until just barely cooked through, about 3 minutes. Do not overcook. Transfer the scallops to a full-sized plate with a slotted spoon and spread them out so that they will not retain all the heat and keep cooking. Take saucepan off the heat, but save it.

Preheat broiler.

Melt 1 tbsp butter in another saucepan over medium heat, and then add breadcrumbs, stirring until they are toasted. Add grated parmesan to pan very briefly, and then remove the breadcrumb mixture to a separate bowl and save. Wipe saucepan clean.

Add 1 tablespoon butter and melt. Whisk in flour to make a roux. Continue light whisking, and add dash of paprika, dash of cayenne pepper, dash of black pepper, 1 tsp salt.

Continue light whisking about 3 minutes. Don't let it start to darken. Then, while continuing to whisk, add the reserved cooking liquid from the other pan in a slow stream. Whisk until the cooking liquid is completely incorporated, then add heavy cream and whisk briefly until incorporated. While continuing to simmer, fold in scallops and mushrooms. Simmer until mixture thickens, occasionally stirring, between zero and 4 minutes, then remove from heat.

Divide scallop mixture into 4 ramekins, filling almost up to the top but not quite. Don't overfill or it will spill out while broiling. If you have scallop shells, use those instead. If you don't have shells or ramekins, use a shallow casserole dish, about 6 inches by 8 inches.

Sprinkle breadcrumb mixture liberally (like Kucinich liberally, not Lieberman liberally) over ramekins (or shells, or baking dish), creating a nice coating. Broil about 6 inches from heat until breadcrumbs and cheese are brown and toasted. About 8 minutes. Or, instead of broiling, refrigerate for up to 2 days, then reheat at 350 for about six minutes before broiling for 8 minutes. Either way, serve with the rest of the wine.

Posted by Barzelay at August 6, 2006 8:36 PM | Comments (10) | EatFoo 1.0 Posts


Comments

Post a new comment


I sent this link to my mom since that's where my recipe actually came from. She's happy you wrote about it. Someday I will make it on my own...

Posted by: Cara Bohon at August 7, 2006 6:30 PM


I'm Cara's sister. I make this too - a rather grown-up favorite from childhood. I like it served over or accompanied by rice. And, "Chicken Coquilles St. Jacques"? Made me giggle.

Posted by: Kate McKinney at August 7, 2006 10:20 PM


I like the ramekins that you use--where'd you get them from? I'm trying to stock up on these essential kitchen niceties. I think I will just get things in white, seeing as that's the way to go in food photography.

Recipe looks tres solide. I have asked my half-French roommate to offer her two pence when she returns from her vacay in France.

Posted by: Natasha D'Souza at August 11, 2006 6:44 PM


They were free with my kitchen torch. The whole package was like $15 from Marshall's (or $35 from Amazon) and I'm very happy with it. Oddly, Marshall's has a lot of great deals on kitchen stuff and housewares.

I also have some Le Creuset ramekins that I didn't take with me this summer, but they are a very different style--perfect for the little molten chocolate cakes, not so perfect for creme brulee.

I actually didn't do a very good job this time on the coquilles St. Jacques. I overfilled the ramekins, and added too much flour. It still turned out okay, but not as good pictures as they might have been.

Posted by: Barzelay at August 11, 2006 6:54 PM


Marshalls? Really?! Very surprising. I intend to try your molten chocolate cake recipe this weekend, hence the hunt for ramekins. I was just going to trot over to Pier 1 and Sur La Table seeing as they have their summer sales right now. I also might check out the Crate & Barrel outlet store in Old Town, Alexandria. I bet they'd have great finds.

The Le Creuset look very sleek. Why do you say they're not as good for creme brulee? Is it because of the shape?

Posted by: Natasha D'Souza at August 11, 2006 7:07 PM


Yeah. Depth is a problem for creme brulee because the outside of the custard will burn before the inside cooks. More surface area is better. Plus it provides for more caramelized sugar topping, which is the distinctive part of creme brulee.

But, the low and flat ones are not even close to workable for the molten cakes. You definitely need the more bowl-like ramekins for that, or else just a cupcake pan.

Posted by: Barzelay at August 11, 2006 7:11 PM


Le Creuset is a great brand. And I got my knife set from Marshall's - they're pretty nice, too.

Posted by: Cara Bohon at August 13, 2006 12:59 PM


I am going to try making this in a casserole dish...looked at a bunch of recipes and thought this one would be good to use as a base. I am adding some different cheeses as well. Will let you know how it comes out and thanks for the help!

Posted by: dar at September 20, 2007 9:31 PM


Actually, "coquille St Jacques" means scallop. coquille just means shell. in france, such a dish would have been made using the shell as the receptacle.

Posted by: Jon F. at December 6, 2007 3:30 PM


Thanks! I should have known that. I edited the post to reflect this info.

Posted by: Barzelay at December 6, 2007 4:45 PM

Post a new comment